In the last post I talked about the design aspect of using CSS3 @font-face, today I would like to extend this topic to the technical side on implementing custom web fonts. So what are the options for implementing web fonts? I’m going to review the three main methods of incorporating @font-face and explain the pros and cons of each method.

1) CSS3 @font-face

Standard @font-face

First, let’s talk about the native way of implementing custom web fonts — @font-face. The CSS syntax for declaring a custom @font-face is very simple. Basically you just need to specify the font name and font file source. Once the font is specified, you can apply it to any element.

@font-face { 
	font-family: "Custom Font Name"; 
	src: url('font.ttf'); 

body {
	font-family: "Custom Font Name";

Bulletproof @font-face Syntax

Because every browser supports different font formats (IE supports EOT only, Firefox supports EOT & TTF, and Safari supports OTF, TTF, and SVG), additional font formats are required to be cross-browse. Below is the bulletproof way of implementing @font-face from Font Spring.

@font-face {
	font-family: 'MyWebFont';
	src: url('webfont.eot'); /* IE9 Compat Modes */
	src: url('webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'), /* IE6-IE8 */
	     url('webfont.woff') format('woff'), /* Modern Browsers */
	     url('webfont.ttf')  format('truetype'), /* Safari, Android, iOS */
	     url('webfont.svg#svgFontName') format('svg'); /* Legacy iOS */

@font-Face Generator

If you need to export the fonts in different formats, there is a generator which allows you to generate various font formats from an existing font. Note: most fonts are not allowed to embed or distribute on the web. Check the licensing information before implementing any fonts.


Premium @font-Faces

Because most fonts do not allow publishing on the internet, Font Spring offers professional fonts with @font-face support. You can buy licensed fonts individually and use freely on your sites.

Pros & Cons

  • PROS: Full control because the fonts are hosted on your server.
  • CONS: The process is a bit complicated because it requires various font formats.

2) Font Service Providers

Another way of using fonts without worrying about licensing issues is by using the fonts from service providers such as Typekit and Fontdeck. With font service providers, the fonts are hosted on their servers and you have to pay a subscription/licensing fee to use the fonts. The process of implementing host fonts is a lot simpler compared to the native way of implementing web fonts because they handle all the font formats and browser compatibility.

Installing Typekit

To install Typekit, it requires two lines of Javascript.

<script type="text/javascript" src=""></script>
<script type="text/javascript">try{Typekit.load();}catch(e){}</script>

Pros & Cons

  • PROS: Easier to implement because you don’t have to generate the different font formats.
  • CONS: It requires subscriptions. Since the fonts are hosted on the service providers, if their servers go down, the fonts will not be available.

3) Google Web Fonts

Google Web Fonts is also consider host font providers, but Google Web Fonts are free. Google fonts are light weight (they load very fast) and they are easy to use.

Implementing Google Web Fonts

To implement Google Web Fonts, just add the line of code below.

<link href='' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css'>

Pros & Cons

  • PROS: Free, lightweight, and loads fast.
  • CONS: Not enough selections and most fonts don’t come with different weights and styles.


@font-face is good if you need to use your own custom fonts. Typekit & Fontdeck offer professional fonts in complete sets (styles & weights), but require subscriptions. Personally, I like Google Web Fonts because it is simple to implement and it loads very fast.


Kasper Christensen
Jul 27, 2011 at 2:12 am

Have been using fontsquirrel for ages with little to no awareness for the license implications, but was not aware of the alternatives such as Great article!

Jul 27, 2011 at 2:20 am

Thank you very much for that article! You braught me light in the dark :)

Jul 27, 2011 at 2:57 am

I was using @font-face, but I switched to Google Fonts. Since version 2 it has much more fonts to choose from and the performance is much better.
Also with @font-face, I had some browser issues that were not solved at the moment I needed to use the font. I think Google Fonts is safer regarding browser compatibility, am I right?

Jul 27, 2011 at 3:32 am

I also think Google fonts is the way to go, they do have a nice selection of typefaces right now. Very few fonts have more than 2-3 weights but that’s basically the norm with free fonts. It’s also a nice ice-breaker for type designers that want to submit their first fonts somewhere.
As long as you don’t necessarily need some very specific commercial typefaces, Google fonts kicks ass.

Gerelt Od
Jul 27, 2011 at 4:13 am

I’m also Google Web font user. But as poster said it has limited offer of fonts library. Especially my country uses Russian like Cyrillic. I found only one font named “PT Sans Narrow”, that has all our language characters.

Jul 27, 2011 at 6:05 am

Don’t forget Cufon!
A great alternative.

Jul 27, 2011 at 10:36 am

Cufon used to be great, but let’s face it, it’s not a match for real browser-rendered fonts with @fontface. Besides, the loading time of a page containing Cufon is dramatically slower than it is with @fontface. Time to step forward and be grateful for what delight it used to be, but fall in love with new and better technology :)

Aug 1, 2011 at 8:38 am

Until we have better anti-aliasing on Windows, Cufon is the only way for me. It’s hard to justify using a non-standard font because it looks better when in fact it looks terrible.

Cufon actually looks good regardless of your browser and OS, because it doesn’t rely on browser anti-aliasing to smooth out the pixels.

Aug 4, 2011 at 1:12 pm

Spot on Chris. Exactly what I have found. I will give up a little performance for something that looks fantastic in all browsers. The goal is to have a happy medium, but the designer in me cannot let the windows fonts pass.

Colin Lafferty
Sep 25, 2012 at 1:01 pm

I would agree with your statemen however you can use the text-shadow property to good effect. By utilising this proerty as the same coour code as your font it can smooth it out providing its 1px.

Thats the method i have adopted and used for quiet some time. The only downside was the lack of support it once had which now is pretty much widely supported.

Internetbureau P
Nov 16, 2011 at 5:06 am

Another interesting read. Keep up the good work.

Jul 27, 2011 at 7:28 am

I agree with what several people have already said, Google Web Fonts seems to be the way to go for free, reliable font service. Their selection has been growing and while you only get a few weights for each font, it is free.

Johnathan Zsittnik
Jul 27, 2011 at 7:31 am

Give Web Fonts ( ) a look for more than 12,000 Web fonts including the big name typefaces such as Helvetica, Frutiger, Univers and many others. @Gerelt there are 410 Cyrillic fonts currently available in the service. Free option as well.

Internetbureau GP
Nov 16, 2011 at 5:08 am

Cheers for the article. We use Google Web Fonts as well.

Bill Davis
Jul 27, 2011 at 7:34 am

I thought you should be aware that there are a few other web font services out there, including Webtype, WebInk and our service

We are proud of the fact that we now have over 12,000 commercial fonts available for use on the web. These include name-brand fonts such as Helvetica®, Frutiger®, Gill Sans®, Univers® and many more. One benefit of the service not mentioned is that when we enhance a font and make improvements to how it displays on-screen, it is then automatically made available to subscribers. Additionally, something not mentioned is that there is a self-host option available for those larger sites who prefer to control all their site assets.

Jul 27, 2011 at 9:48 am

I use google web fonts for all of my custom blog themes and I love it. I’m also excited to see them adding new fonts pretty regularly, and I’m very impressed with the revamped website.

Jul 27, 2011 at 9:59 am

I think it’s important to point out that @font-face was in the CSS2 spec also, but was removed from CSS2.1. It’s also supported by IE6, although you need another font format, but at least it’s supported.

Ben Peck
Jul 27, 2011 at 10:12 am

Fully support @font-face

If you work on a site that has 10’s of thousands of page views a day Typekit is NOT the way to go. For them to track font usage they don’t cache the font so it has to pull the font on every page load.

TypeKit is great for smaller sites that don’t generate tons of traffic.

Jul 27, 2011 at 11:10 am

Thanks a ton! I was just wandering around for the very information. Your article just fed me with the sufficient knowledge about custom @font-face fonts. Thanks again :)

Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 am

In fact, you can choose different font weights and styles in Google web fonts.
Like this:

Jul 27, 2011 at 2:47 pm

Doesn’t anyone else get horrible aliasing under Windows based browsers (yes, even on Chrome and Firefox)? Even more-so when using Google’s hosted fonts?

Jul 28, 2011 at 12:29 am

Does @font-face works on IE7 and IE8??

Jul 28, 2011 at 2:43 am

we miss your judgement on Cufon – – –

Nick La
Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 pm

Cufon is font/image replacement. It doesn’t consider @font-face solution.

Jul 28, 2011 at 9:43 am

I use Typekit, they provide a great service however, i think that @font-face would be the better choice if you do not want to subscribe.

Jul 28, 2011 at 11:10 am

really nice article and brilliant work and this will help us .

SEO from Creare
Jul 29, 2011 at 3:28 am

Heard of the other methods except for google fonts, this method sounds good as its light weight, im going to try this to test.

Another great post thanks!

Jul 30, 2011 at 1:06 am

What do you have for the newbies?

Jon P
Jul 31, 2011 at 1:08 pm

Use Cufon. You just need a font file. It’s pretty straight forward.

Aug 2, 2011 at 9:54 am

Ok, but the cufón is heavy, one font 1 or 2 MB. This service is easier then cufón.

Aug 12, 2011 at 9:13 am

I think cufon isn’t a great solution, if you want to get your website future-proof. The future of web standards (embedding fonts) really lies in @font-face, instead of finding a way to hack around it…

Aug 15, 2011 at 10:23 am

After several trials with @font-face I still rely on cufon because it is backward compatible, and it is graphically much more beautiful than @font-face. The only problem is cufon forward compatibility… They update oftenly but you should followup carefully…

Jul 30, 2011 at 3:34 pm

Thanks. I want use all time especific fonts in my websites.

Jul 31, 2011 at 1:35 am

I have found that sometimes the cufon alternative is better

Jon P
Jul 31, 2011 at 1:07 pm

At our company we use Cufon. The only downside about using it is that the end user can’t mark the text because it’s pictures. Anyway I think that you no matter what should be carfull using speciel fonts for text. I recemend to use it in headers and so and not for reading text that people might want to mark. :-)

Jay Rajput
Aug 2, 2011 at 5:57 am

Check Out nice nemo slider Freebie

Jay Rajput
Aug 2, 2011 at 5:58 am

Check out this nice freebie slider psd

yogesh mahale
Aug 3, 2011 at 12:01 pm


yogesh mahale
Aug 3, 2011 at 12:01 pm


Aug 9, 2011 at 7:09 am

First and foremost, I think you need a help of a psychiatrist

Aug 3, 2011 at 6:17 pm

The stability is key point; I will not consider Font Service Providers

Siraceddin El
Aug 4, 2011 at 4:13 am

Thanks. A useful tutorial.

Aug 4, 2011 at 1:09 pm

I have found that using cufon is the only bullet proof solution to having fonts render identical no matter the browser or OS. But it is very heavy.

@font-face or any of the options above are great if you can get past the crappy rendering that PC’s give you. Historically, depending on the font itself, I have not been happy with how my custom font choices look on a windows machine. But I am biased.

Aug 15, 2011 at 10:27 am

totally agree

Aug 5, 2011 at 7:46 am

I will use especific fonts in my website design
Thank You

Andrew Berrel
Aug 5, 2011 at 7:55 am

I personally have some problems with embedded fonts while they undergo a CSS Animation. Seems that CSS still needs more refinement, so that their different parts can work together, not just separately.

Aug 5, 2011 at 10:07 am

I’ve had trouble using the @font-face method. However, it is less code heavy from Cufon. These browsers are going to have to get some consistency in rendering the CSS3 @font-face properties. Anyway, thanks a lot for sharing.

Aug 5, 2011 at 3:13 pm

Thank You for good tutorial

slideshow wordpress plugin
Aug 6, 2011 at 11:08 pm

I am a beginner in web designing. And I am not well in it. I can not design font face in wordpress. Here I have got a great solution.

Justin Nguyen
Aug 8, 2011 at 9:15 am

It’s available and auto on Blogger. Just for WP.

Oct 3, 2012 at 6:28 am

i love using font-face, not fan of cuFon and so on…

Aug 9, 2011 at 12:00 am

Nice post! I’ve mostly been using font squirrel, although I think I’ll give Google Web Fonts a try now.

Aug 9, 2011 at 9:30 am

Is there a way to deliver to a specific browser?
I have problems with font-face in FF4 on PC, all the other browsers are fine…
So, is there a way to serve FF4 with for example Cufon, or a general font?

Gary Davison
Aug 11, 2011 at 6:49 pm


I recently embedded a font using @font-face and the Mac rendered the font differently to a PC. It displayed it thicker and bolder.

Has anyone else had this issue, whilst using @font-face? In the end I had to resort to using Cufon instead.

Aug 12, 2011 at 5:08 pm

CUFON is great for large scale headline fonts, but its just not feasible for smaller font sizes, since it changes the text to PNG on the fly. I like @font best, but tend to use online font services more so I dont have to worry about breaking EULA on the fonts we use here.

Aug 15, 2011 at 11:54 am

Thanks, Intersting, Nice post.

Aug 15, 2011 at 12:53 pm

With Google Webfonts, there are many more options than there used to be. Google just updated the Google Webfont interface, and added many, many new fonts. Many don’t have multiple weights, but most body copy fonts have regular, bold, and italic.

I still use Google Webfonts as my first stop for selecting fonts. If I can’t find any there, I will use FontSquirrel fonts. I hate all those paid webfont subscriptions, and try to avoid them. There are enough decent free webfonts. Why pay a subscription when clients don’t like extra charges?

Aug 15, 2011 at 11:24 pm

Not working in mac

website design westchester
Aug 17, 2011 at 3:30 pm

CUFON give me trouble in explorer 9

Oct 13, 2011 at 10:27 am

Just get latest Cufon JS files, should fix this in IE9

Milwaukee Web Design
Aug 19, 2011 at 5:56 pm

Google sounds like the best option…to have to install the fonts on your own server for every website seems like it could be time consuming. I’m sure, as CSS continues to evolve, we’ll see more solutions to this web design challenge.

Aug 20, 2011 at 6:21 am

Hi there!

This solved a big issue on my site.

I was using cufon and transform (skew) effect, but its not working in IE8 and IE9. I searched a lot for another solution, and this helped me!!!!!! :)

BTW, is there any solution to using cufon and transform effect together [e.g. I am using: skew(0deg, -10deg)] ??

Please reply back if any solution is there.

Thanks a ton!!!!!!!!

M Francis
Aug 22, 2011 at 7:43 pm

FONTS are cool for web design, but more so for print… I will wait until a more accepted, universal solution to web fonts is available.
Aug 24, 2011 at 4:36 am

I’ve always been weiting for something like google web fonts. Your single con is obselete: Google got already 238 fonts online, and it’s growing fast and constantly.

Free Sick Wallpapers
Aug 24, 2011 at 1:04 pm

Check this out everyone Featured Wallpapers
Especially to suit your Mobile Phone!!

Web Design - Jared
Aug 25, 2011 at 8:21 pm

We used font squirrel quite a bit until we realized we had some inconsistencies with the way IE fonts were created, example they would have padding on the top of them.

Web Design Hull
Sep 3, 2011 at 4:19 pm

Cufon is great for main headlines, but it’s really nice seeing body text in a decent google webfont, I tend to use different methods for different websites.

JB Web Design
Sep 5, 2011 at 2:28 am

Interesting summary. I’ve never used Google fonts, I’ll have to check it out

Sep 6, 2011 at 12:36 pm

Thanks for it :)

Sep 9, 2011 at 12:27 am

Is the following code wrong..??

@font-face {
font-family: “myfont”;
src: url(“../myfont.ttf”);
*src: url(“../myfont.eot”);
src: url(“../myfont.eot”)\9;

where “*” is the working for IE7 and “/9” for IE8. I haven’t worked for IE9 but the above code is working on all browser in my case.

Alen Carl
Sep 11, 2011 at 6:06 am

Thanks for your suggestions

Nand Kishor Singh
Sep 13, 2011 at 4:36 am

Thanks for this cool post. It is very useful when we have to use own styling fonts.

Seattle Real Estate Guy
Sep 13, 2011 at 7:40 am

I guess it’s time for me to try css3. Thanks.

Sharif Hamdy
Sep 22, 2011 at 4:27 pm

Autson is an outstanding name in the field of web design, web development, and experts in Internet marketing. We are providing innovative and creative web development and designing solutions which ensure your strong online business presence as well as gave you a way to expand your business.

Sep 26, 2011 at 10:54 pm

Thanks for your suggestions

Sep 29, 2011 at 10:07 am

Cufon was good at one point, now I just keep it simple :)

Oct 2, 2011 at 11:28 am

Google Font API is same as Font-Face … !

Oct 3, 2011 at 2:24 am

i love this site i learn a lot from this site

Oct 4, 2011 at 12:06 pm

A nice tip to use fonts with every browser for webdesigners (diseñadores web en méxico), thanx to the team of wdw…

Oct 5, 2011 at 1:55 pm

Thanks for this very comprehensive post. I’ve used cufon in the past to install fonts, which was javascript based, but I was aware of @font-face and also Google Web Fonts, which are both great tools.

Oct 13, 2011 at 10:25 am

What about Kernest?

Oct 22, 2011 at 8:20 am

Great article, I’ve been looking for something for information on font face kits and typography. I found this one about general typogaphy, but its more gear towards standard web safe fonts:

Trevor Saint
Oct 25, 2011 at 8:06 am

Thanks for this useful article. Well written, and very helpful.

Oct 29, 2011 at 3:08 pm

hey mate, thanks for sharing that Bulletproof way.
long live html5/css3!

Internetbureau Webtraders
Nov 9, 2011 at 9:42 am

Cufon is indeed a great alternative! Thnx for the tip!

Nov 19, 2011 at 6:41 am

Nice tutorial.Thank you for sharing.

Nov 21, 2011 at 5:12 am

Font Squirrel is amazing for font-face. A great selections of copyright free fonts. You can download kits with all fonts formats (svg, otf, etc) and a css file. It’s dead easy. You can even create your own kit if you know of to create fonts.

I love it

Dhawal Choksi
Nov 25, 2011 at 5:06 am

Good article!! Something what I was about to look for. Saved me a search and a lot of time.

Dec 5, 2011 at 10:43 am

I ‘ve just studied CSS3.I like your tips.thank for font face css guide.

Solution architect job description
Feb 10, 2012 at 5:46 pm

The major papers reported today about exploding obesity rates. Especially for children in Australia and the US. There was no suggestion anywhere of a solution to the problem, except for surgery. Is there a solution?

SEO Exeter
Feb 13, 2012 at 9:50 am

We quite like the Cufon font, but are looking more towards the “Apple” font as it’s clearer and easier to read for our visitors! Thanks for the article though!

web design 123
Mar 7, 2012 at 8:22 pm

Nice article. I have to have a better look in to which fonts I want to use on my web designs in the future and this article gave me some good ideas. Thanks

Facebook chat codes
Mar 31, 2012 at 6:59 am

I just started learning css. Nice article

Apr 30, 2012 at 12:58 pm

This does look like a great theme.hloer

Shamier Coffie
May 10, 2012 at 8:25 am

Really nice article You braught me light in the dark

Thiet ke logo
May 17, 2012 at 9:30 pm

simple effect, this is their need!

Logo Design
Jul 18, 2012 at 4:20 am

I will be trying this on my next project.

Ibiza yates
Jul 29, 2012 at 3:00 pm

I’ve been looking for something for information on font face kits and typography. I found this one about general typogaphy, but its more gear towards standard web safe fonts

May 27, 2013 at 12:04 pm

Hey !
Great steps indeed. Really liked the whole post.

May 29, 2013 at 3:35 am

Just wanna say ‘Thanks’ . . . !

Post Comment or Questions

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *